NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9903 vs 9390
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56602 vs 45611
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 137.469
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 2083.862
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 12.352
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 139.477
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 vs 9390 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 vs 45611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 139.477 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- 2x more core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 488
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 vs 729.947
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 12750
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 488 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 vs 729.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | 9390 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 789 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 45611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 139.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 762.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Polaris 30 |
| Place in performance rating | 274 | 271 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 15 November 2018 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1469 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
