AMD Radeon RX 640 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3x more boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 128x more pipelines: 512 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 352 vs 197
- 49.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2142 vs 43
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 30 August 2006 |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 vs 197 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 vs 43 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 197 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | 43 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 30 August 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 922 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 4 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
