AMD Radeon RX 640 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 640

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
3.1x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 350 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1200 MHz
1353.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1769 vs 1596
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1769 vs 1596
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 1870
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 1870
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11683 vs 4657
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 352 vs 299
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2142 vs 1237

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 1 September 2017
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278 vs 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278 vs 1870
Geekbench - OpenCL	11683 vs 4657
PassMark - G2D Mark	352 vs 299
PassMark - G3D Mark	2142 vs 1237

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2775
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2775

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309 vs 2775

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1596

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1596

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3309

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3309

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

1870

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

1870

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11683

4657

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

352

299

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2142

1237

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	Intel UHD Graphics 630
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	1870
Geekbench - OpenCL	11683	4657
PassMark - G2D Mark	352	299
PassMark - G3D Mark	2142	1237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		29.327
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		68

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 9.5
Code name	Arctic Islands	Coffee Lake GT2
Launch date	13 May 2019	1 September 2017
Place in performance rating	794	1234
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1200 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	24
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	28.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	189 million
Floating-point performance		460.8 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Quick Sync