AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 1459.9x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 26.7 billion / sec
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 512 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 2999
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 2999
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 9276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 31 May 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 26.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 352 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 vs 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 vs 2999 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 vs 9276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 1769
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 2775
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 2775
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 339
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2673 vs 1954
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 2775 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 339 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2673 vs 1954 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 2999 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | 9276 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 462 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1954 | 2673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.513 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GF100 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 31 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 811 | 825 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $263.28 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 352 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 26.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,100 million |
| Compute performance | 30x | |
| CUDA cores | 352 | |
| Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pins |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 102.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
