AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 640

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 993 MHz
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1072 MHz
1226.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 8849
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 312

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 993 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10390 vs 8849
PassMark - G2D Mark	339 vs 312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1769
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1769
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2775
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2775
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3278
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3278
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2881 vs 1954

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 3278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 3278
PassMark - G3D Mark	2881 vs 1954

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4196

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10390

8849

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

339

312

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1954

2881

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	4196
Geekbench - OpenCL	10390	8849
PassMark - G2D Mark	339	312
PassMark - G3D Mark	1954	2881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		137.786
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Arctic Islands	GM107
Launch date	13 May 2019	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	811	831
Launch price (MSRP)		$200.89
Price now		$203.37
Type		Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)		16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1072 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	993 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	512
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	31.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,017 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus