AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 640

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 601 MHz
579.1x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 67.31 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11376 vs 5107

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 7 August 2012
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 601 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 67.31 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	11376 vs 5107

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1769
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1769
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2775
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2775
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 3278
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 3278
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 342
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2779 vs 2017

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1344 vs 512
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3712 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3712 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4825 vs 3278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4825 vs 3278
PassMark - G2D Mark	355 vs 342
PassMark - G3D Mark	2779 vs 2017

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4825

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4825

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11376

5107

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

342

355

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2017

2779

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	4825
Geekbench - OpenCL	11376	5107
PassMark - G2D Mark	342	355
PassMark - G3D Mark	2017	2779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		68.712

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Arctic Islands	GK104
Launch date	13 May 2019	7 August 2012
Place in performance rating	808	805
Launch price (MSRP)		$329.99
Price now		$391
Type		Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)		8.47
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	601 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	1344
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	67.31 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	3,540 million
Floating-point performance		1,615 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	Dual-slot
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	3000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)