AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 640

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 732 MHz
950.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
4.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 210 Watt
Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB

Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 29 November 2011
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 732 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 210 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1280 MB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2.2x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1769
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1769
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2775
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2775
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 3278
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 3278

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	3800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2133 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2133 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4590 vs 3278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4590 vs 3278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

2133

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

2133

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4590

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4590

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	2133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	4590
Geekbench - OpenCL	11518
PassMark - G2D Mark	350
PassMark - G3D Mark	2099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		34.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1181.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		58.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		121.575
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4197

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Arctic Islands	GF110
Launch date	13 May 2019	29 November 2011
Place in performance rating	804	802
Launch price (MSRP)		$289
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	732 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	448
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	41.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	210 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	3,000 million
Floating-point performance		1,311.7 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1280 MB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	152.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	3800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)