AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6550M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6550M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 2840 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 513x more texture fill rate: 181.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 3.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1024
- 2.8x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 473
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18565 vs 9605
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67595 vs 45316
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 473 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18565 vs 9605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67595 vs 45316 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6550M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 | 934 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9605 | 18565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45316 | 67595 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6550M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP102 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 208 | 206 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |