AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1489 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 2105 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16471 vs 13921
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 724
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82703 vs 66187
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15486 vs 14178
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15486 vs 14178
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1804 vs 1495
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1489 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 2105 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 vs 13921 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 vs 66187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 vs 14178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 vs 14178 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1804 vs 1495 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3728
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3367
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3728
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3367
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 30 Jul 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3367 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 | 13921 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 | 66187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 14178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 8612 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 8006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 14178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 8612 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 8006 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1804 | 1495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | Navi 23 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 169 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1489 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | 7.544 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | 134.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 235.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 11060 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |