AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 665.3x more texture fill rate: 235.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3357
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1792
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 13921
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 724
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 66187
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 14178
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 14178
- Around 49% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 vs 1495
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 13921 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 66187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 14178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 14178 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 vs 1495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13921 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66187 | 67670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1495 | 2231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 23 | GP102 |
Launch date | 2021 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 219 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |