AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1825 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2250 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3714
- 15.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3350
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3714
- 15.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2250 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26856 vs 19887
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 941
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 161057 vs 97111
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 349.422
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 34.064
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 197.183
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1699.337
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 vs 15315
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 vs 15315
- Around 64% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 vs 12774
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26856 vs 19887 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 941 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161057 vs 97111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 349.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 34.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 197.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1699.337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 vs 15315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 vs 15315 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 vs 12774 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19887 | 26856 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | 1048 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 97111 | 161057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 51.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 320.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 2566.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12774 | 20909 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 46 | 70 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 50 mm (2 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
