AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT versus AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2321 MHz versus 1825 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2581 MHz versus 2250 MHz
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 versus 3714
- 15.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 versus 3350
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 versus 3714
- 15.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 Mar 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 2321 MHz versus 1825 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2581 MHz versus 2250 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Environ 74% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 413.0 GTexel/s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2560
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26857 versus 19881
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1049 versus 941
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 161020 versus 97024
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 349.422
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 34.064
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 197.183
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 1699.337
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 versus 15315
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 versus 15315
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20924 versus 12773
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 413.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 2560 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 12 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26857 versus 19881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1049 versus 941 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161020 versus 97024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 34.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 197.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 1699.337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 versus 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 versus 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20924 versus 12773 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19881 | 26857 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | 1049 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 97024 | 161020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12773 | 20924 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
Date de sortie | 3 Mar 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $479 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 49 | 70 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2581 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | 80 |
Vitesse du noyau | 2321 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 413.0 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17200 million | 26800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 50 mm (2 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |