AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13537 vs 13169
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78059 vs 69537
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16145 vs 13044
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16145 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13537 vs 13169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78059 vs 69537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 vs 567
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 vs 567 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | 780 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13537 | 13169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78059 | 69537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 13044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1846 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 22 | Vega 10 |
Place in performance rating | 122 | 120 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |