AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 324.0 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 564
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 13560
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 78243
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 16145
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 16145
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 1845
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 10 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 13560 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 78243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 16145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 16145 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 1845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 971 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13560 | 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78243 | 88251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 22495 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1845 | 1961 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA106 |
Place in performance rating | 126 | 134 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 13250 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |