AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 324.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2304
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 573
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20470 vs 13549
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 77407
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 16145
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 16145
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11689 vs 9503
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4864 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 573 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20470 vs 13549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 77407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 16145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 16145 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11689 vs 9503 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 573 | 989 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13549 | 20470 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77407 | 109075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 27478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 27478 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9503 | 11689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
| Place in performance rating | 102 | 99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4864 |
| Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6700M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAA30
