AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 324.0 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- 2.7x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2304
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1004 vs 573
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19460 vs 13549
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121214 vs 77407
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 16145
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 16145
- Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11043 vs 9503
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 10 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1004 vs 573 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19460 vs 13549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121214 vs 77407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 16145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 16145 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11043 vs 9503 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 573 | 1004 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13549 | 19460 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77407 | 121214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 22050 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9503 | 11043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
| Place in performance rating | 102 | 105 |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6700M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAA30
