AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- 4763.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9527 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9527 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1489 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 569
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19549 vs 13498
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115519 vs 77709
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 16145
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 16145
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1489 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 569 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19549 vs 13498 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115519 vs 77709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 16145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 16145 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 920 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13498 | 19549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77709 | 115519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 27179 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9527 | 2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 22 | TU104 |
| Place in performance rating | 104 | 107 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch date | 23 July 2019 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6700M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
IntelArc A580
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAA30
