AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 571
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19278 vs 13587
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 152165 vs 77374
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 16145
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 16145
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 vs 571 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19278 vs 13587 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 152165 vs 77374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 16145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 16145 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 571 | 858 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13587 | 19278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77374 | 152165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 21578 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9503 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 22 | TU102 |
Place in performance rating | 102 | 104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |