AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA RTX A6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1860 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 573 vs 86
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13549 vs 4237
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1860 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 573 vs 86 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13549 vs 4237 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 324.0 GTexel/s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 10752 vs 2304
- 4.8x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 10 GB
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 vs 77407
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 16145
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 16145
- Around 88% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 vs 9503
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s vs 324.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10752 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 10 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 vs 77407 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 vs 16145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 vs 16145 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 vs 9503 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA RTX A6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 573 | 86 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13549 | 4237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77407 | 193937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 23142 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9503 | 17833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA102 |
Place in performance rating | 101 | 98 |
Type | Laptop | |
Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1860 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | 40.00 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 10752 |
Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | 208.3 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | 625.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 48 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |