AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102262 vs 88096
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 972 vs 819
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19691 vs 16112
- 8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 12608 vs 1569
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 vs 17 October 2018 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102262 vs 88096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 vs 819 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19691 vs 16112 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12608 vs 1569 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102262 | 88096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 | 819 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19691 | 16112 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12608 | 1569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 22 | TU106 |
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 | 17 October 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 42 | 151 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |