AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
| Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- 4.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 100691
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 941
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 18913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 vs 100691 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 941 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 vs 18913 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 100691 | 188320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | 1051 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18913 | 26815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 22 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 40 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | Triple-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with others
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
