AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1708 MHz
- 4850.3x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 vs 8160
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 vs 444
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 vs 31098
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 111.55
- 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 8.49
- 14.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 19.803
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 509.222
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16849 vs 12645
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3654
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16849 vs 12645
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3654
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 15 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1708 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 vs 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 vs 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 vs 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 vs 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 vs 3677 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 | 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 | 3677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 21 | GP106B |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $237.11 |
Place in performance rating | 71 | 385 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 4,400 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |