AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1506 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1708 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 648.0 GTexel/s versus 133.6 GTexel / s
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 4608 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 versus 8160
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 versus 444
- 5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 versus 31098
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 versus 111.55
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 versus 8.49
- 14.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 versus 19.803
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 versus 509.222
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16849 versus 12645
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 versus 3654
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16849 versus 12645
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 versus 3654
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 15 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1506 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1708 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 648.0 GTexel/s versus 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4608 versus 1280 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 versus 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 versus 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 versus 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 versus 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 versus 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 versus 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 versus 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 versus 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 versus 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 versus 3677 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 | 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 | 3677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 21 | GP106B |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | $237.11 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 71 | 385 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 72 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 648.0 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 4,400 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |