AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 247.569
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 2441.384
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3354
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• 2.3x more pipelines: 10496 vs 4608
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 25118
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 1020
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 150058
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 578.52
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 52.561
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 16849
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 16849
• Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 19416

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	25118 26815
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1020 1051
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	150058 188320
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	578.52 732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.561 63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	291.971 247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2700.97 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16849 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3720 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3374 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16849 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3720 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3374 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19416 19877

Compare specifications (specs)