AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 10945.9x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more pipelines: 4608 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16849 vs 5923
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3356
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16849 vs 5923
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 vs 5923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 vs 5923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 5923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 5923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 21 | GP107 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 71 | 525 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |