AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25026 vs 19278
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1018 vs 858
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 401.574
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 43.914
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 215.219
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 2101.927
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3652
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3652
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25026 vs 19278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1018 vs 858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 16849
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 16849
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151166 vs 150647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 16849 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25026 | 19278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1018 | 858 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150647 | 151166 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19441 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU102 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $9,999 |
Place in performance rating | 69 | 104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |