AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 82% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 88% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25107 versus 19370
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1020 versus 869
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 150072 versus 137262
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 versus 401.574
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 versus 43.914
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 versus 215.219
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 versus 2101.927
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 versus 3652
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 versus 3652
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25107 versus 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 versus 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 150072 versus 137262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 versus 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 versus 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 versus 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 versus 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 16849
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 16849
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 16849 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25107 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 150072 | 137262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19416 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | $9,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 62 | 103 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 72 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4608 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 648.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAA40
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
