AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and AMD Radeon Pro V520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13297 vs 12258
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 525
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87802 vs 61570
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17137 vs 13220
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 16807
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17137 vs 13220
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 16807
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13297 vs 12258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87802 vs 61570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 vs 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 vs 16807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 vs 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 vs 16807 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 16764
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 16764
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 16764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 16764 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro V520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | AMD Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13297 | 12258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87802 | 61570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | 16807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | 37642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | 16807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 | 37642 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800M | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 22 | Navi 12 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 74 | 61 |
| Type | Laptop | Server |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | 36 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 102.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 230.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
