AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1825 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2250 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 3714
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 16764 vs 3350
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 3714
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 16764 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2250 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26791 vs 13263
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1046 vs 545
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163724 vs 88035
- Around 86% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20957 vs 11254
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26791 vs 13263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1046 vs 545 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163724 vs 88035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 vs 17137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 vs 17137 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20957 vs 11254 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13263 | 26791 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 1046 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88035 | 163724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11254 | 20957 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800M | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 76 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 80 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |