AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD Radeon HD 6320
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and AMD Radeon HD 6320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.8x more boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 64x more pipelines: 5120 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 181.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 vs 147
- 24.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 43
- 515.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 vs 323
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 684
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1474
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 684
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1474
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 16 November 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 80 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 vs 147 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 vs 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1474 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6320
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 147 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 1474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 1474 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon HD 6320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Zacate |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 16 November 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $554.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 62 | 1615 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Price now | $554.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 80 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
