AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 2105 MHz
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26853 vs 22313
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 973
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 161048 vs 126207
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 432.118
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 41.585
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 2280.457
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 vs 16162
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 vs 16162
- Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 vs 16306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 2105 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 vs 22313 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161048 vs 126207 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 vs 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 vs 16162 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 vs 16306 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 320.733
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3373 vs 3350
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3373 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 320.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 | 22313 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161048 | 126207 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 383.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3373 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 16306 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $579 |
| Place in performance rating | 70 | 76 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | 60 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
