NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 5120
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 259.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 vs 779
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26791 vs 17954
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 164114 vs 106358
- Around 86% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20957 vs 11283
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 259.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 vs 779 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26791 vs 17954 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 164114 vs 106358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20957 vs 11283 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 779 | 1047 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17954 | 26791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106358 | 164114 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11283 | 20957 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 73 | 76 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.60 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5888 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 135.4 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 259.4 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 80 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |