AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1709 MHz
- 5267x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 vs 14345
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 vs 14345
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 5 January 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1709 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 vs 14345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 vs 14345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26791 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1046 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163724 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 14345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 14345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20957 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 21 | GP106 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 5 January 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 76 | 77 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 250 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |