AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz
• Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1680 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1920
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27070 vs 13877
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1149 vs 752
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 165115 vs 70344
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 532.345 vs 220.457
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 50.602 vs 21.852
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 288.807 vs 135.923
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2563.25 vs 1141.283
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19167 vs 7592

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 16859
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 23622 vs 3714
• 16.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 56437 vs 3350
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 16859
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 23622 vs 3714
• 16.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 56437 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	27070 13877
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1149 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	165115 70344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	532.345 220.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.602 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	288.807 135.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2563.25 1141.283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16859 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 23622
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 56437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16859 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 23622
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 56437
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19167 7592

Compare specifications (specs)