AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz
• Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1680 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1920
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26385 vs 13846
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1132 vs 751
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 165302 vs 70360
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 533.405 vs 220.629
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.08 vs 21.852
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 135.725
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1126.61
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19088 vs 7603

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19427 vs 15985
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 23622 vs 7440
• 16.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 56437 vs 3360
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19427 vs 15985
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 23622 vs 7440
• 16.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 56437 vs 3360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26385 13846
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1132 751
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	165302 70360
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	533.405 220.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.08 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	320.733 135.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566.9 1126.61
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15985 19427
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7440 23622
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 56437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15985 19427
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7440 23622
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 56437
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19088 7603

Compare specifications (specs)