AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 vs 14119
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 746
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 vs 71402
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 217.04
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 21.707
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 133.975
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1141.283
- 17x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 vs 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 vs 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1141.283 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 17213
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3714
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3350
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 17213
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3714
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 3119.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 | 1242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 62 | 161 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
