AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 vs 19514
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 920
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 vs 115804
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 338.122
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 31.6
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 190.349
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1653.08
- 10545x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 23 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 vs 19514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 vs 115804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 190.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1653.08 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 17213
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 17213
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 19514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 115804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 190.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1653.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 62 | 110 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |