AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 vs 21601
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 928
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 vs 134929
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 394.035
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 41.104
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 174.185
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1987.605
- 6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 3537
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 vs 21601 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 928 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 vs 134929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 394.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 41.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 174.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1987.605 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 vs 3537 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 17213
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 17213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 21601 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 928 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 134929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 394.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 5461.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 41.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 174.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1987.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 | 3537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 62 | 91 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $1,279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
