AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26853 versus 21785
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 versus 935
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 161035 versus 138583
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 394.035
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 41.133
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 173.697
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 1987.605
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 versus 14606
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 versus 21785 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 versus 935 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 versus 138583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 394.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 41.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 173.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 1987.605 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 versus 14606 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 17213
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 17213
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 | 21785 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 935 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 | 138583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 394.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 5461.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 41.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 173.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1987.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 14606 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 83 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
