AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 2544 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 245 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1128 vs 1055
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1128 vs 1055 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 549.5 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3456
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26679 vs 22459
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 126914
- Around 54% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5115 vs 3312
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 549.5 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 3456 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26679 vs 22459 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 126914 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5115 vs 3312 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1128 | 1055 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22459 | 26679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126914 | 191142 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3312 | 5115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5528.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 32 | GA102 |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 48 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Compute units | 54 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3456 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 28100 million | 28300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | Triple-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |