AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 9.8x more texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
  • 4.4x more pipelines: 704 vs 160
  • 7.9x better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2110 vs 330
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 441
  • 30.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14579 vs 476
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1832
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1832
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 7 January 2012
Texture fill rate 55 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 704 vs 160
Floating-point performance 1,760 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2110 vs 330
PassMark - G2D Mark 521 vs 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 14579 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1857 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1857 vs 1832

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M

  • 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3107
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3107
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3493 vs 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3493 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2110
330
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
521
441
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
14579
476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1857
1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3107
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1857
1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3107
3493
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 AMD Radeon HD 7450M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2110 330
PassMark - G2D Mark 521 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 14579 476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1857 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3107 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1857 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3107 3493
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1201

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 AMD Radeon HD 7450M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Raven Seymour
Launch date 13 February 2018 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 813 815
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1240 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,760 gflops 224.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 704 160
Texture fill rate 55 GTexel / s 5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 7 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Shared memory 0 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5