AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 9.8x more texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 704 vs 160
- 7.9x better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2110 vs 330
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 441
- 30.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14579 vs 476
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1832
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 7 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2110 vs 330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14579 vs 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 1832 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3107
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2110 | 330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14579 | 476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3493 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Raven | Seymour |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 815 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 224.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 7 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 |