AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
• Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 170 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 434
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14579 vs 10724
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 31.935
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.344
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 35.841
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 64.308
• 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 vs 389

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3057 vs 2110
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 539.966 vs 364.578
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 3455
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3107
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 3455
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2110 3057
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	521 434
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14579 10724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 389

Compare specifications (specs)