AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 1211.3x more texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 vs 15019
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 vs 15019
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 vs 10 March 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1406 MHz
- 827.7x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 345 Watt
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1406 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 345 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3357 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18583 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67652 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP102 |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 218 | 216 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13.7 TFLOPs | 11,340 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 107.30 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 345 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 282 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 1000 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |