NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1406 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1677 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 345 Watt
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 7 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1406 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1677 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 345 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 vs 16952
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 vs 16952
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12914 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 809 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 19324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 19324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 214 | 216 |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 345 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,600 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 13.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Pixel fill rate | 107.30 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 282 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 1000 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |