AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1677 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 429.30 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 versus 15019
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 versus 15019
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 10 March 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1677 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 429.30 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3584 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 versus 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 versus 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1406 MHz
- 827.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,340 gflops versus 13.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 345 Watt
- Environ 38% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 11 GB versus 8 GB
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 1890 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1406 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops versus 13.7 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 345 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 11 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18583 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67652 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2230 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 218 | 216 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1677 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1406 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 13.7 TFLOPs | 11,340 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 107.30 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 429.30 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 345 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
| Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 282 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 1000 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 352 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 11008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
IntelArc A310
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
AMDRadeon 740M
