AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 429.3 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 13,738 gflops vs 8,873 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 189x more memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7765 vs 7546
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 27 May 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
| Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops vs 8,873 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 vs 7546 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1406 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1677 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1406 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1677 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 | 7546 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15554 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55407 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 27 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 265 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 180 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid with others
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs
AMDRadeon R9 390 X2
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs
NVIDIATesla T4
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs
IntelArc A380
