NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1406 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1677 MHz
• 321.5x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

• 3.2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1280
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 67% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7765 vs 4659

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1 GPU 2

4659 7765

Compare specifications (specs)