AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 13 February 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 38 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,216 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 392
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 vs 1494
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3157
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 38 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,216 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 392 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 637 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1494 | 2269 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 13 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 663 | 666 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Price now | $260.70 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,216 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 38 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,500 million | 1,500 million |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
IntelUHD Graphics 730
