AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon Pro 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 907 MHz
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3621 vs 3475
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19593 vs 15826
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 41.388
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 614.695
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.134 vs 3.837
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 31.274
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 189.085
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 4695
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 4695

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 480
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1514
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3621 3475
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	480 724
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19593 15826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.134 3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3349

Compare specifications (specs)