AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 2,142 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3632 vs 3594
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19593 vs 12012
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 24.986
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 826.477
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.134 vs 2.362
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 35.269
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 55.394
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 6030
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 6030

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
• Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 555 vs 481
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1514
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3632 3594
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	481 555
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19593 12012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 24.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 826.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.134 2.362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 35.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 55.394
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3347

Compare specifications (specs)