Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz
  • 652.8x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 vs 58.971
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2070
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1514
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2070
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1514
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 February 2018
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz
Texture fill rate 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 79.73 vs 58.971
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 vs 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 vs 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 1514

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
  • Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3791 vs 2682
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 vs 367
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19228 vs 12007
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 1137.292
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 4.585
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 61.701
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 193.595
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5609
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5609
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 931 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1280 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3791 vs 2682
PassMark - G2D Mark 484 vs 367
Geekbench - OpenCL 19228 vs 12007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.247 vs 1137.292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.195 vs 4.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.289 vs 61.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 252.311 vs 193.595
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6318 vs 5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6318 vs 5609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2682
3791
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
367
484
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12007
19228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
79.73
58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1137.292
1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.585
5.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
61.701
75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
193.595
252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5609
6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5609
6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
1514
Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
PassMark - G3D Mark 2682 3791
PassMark - G2D Mark 367 484
Geekbench - OpenCL 12007 19228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 79.73 58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1137.292 1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.585 5.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 61.701 75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 193.595 252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5609 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5609 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 1514
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2091

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.0 GCN 4.0
Code name Tiger Lake GT1 Polaris 22
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 1 February 2018
Place in performance rating 631 634
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1011 MHz
Compute units 48
Core clock speed 300 MHz 931 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 1280
Pixel fill rate 13.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 52.80 GTexel/s 80.88 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 204.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 1024 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz
Memory type HBM2
Shared memory 0