Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 652.8x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 vs 58.971
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1514
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 vs 58.971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1514 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3791 vs 2682
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 vs 367
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19228 vs 12007
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 1137.292
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 4.585
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 61.701
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 193.595
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5609
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5609
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3791 vs 2682 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 vs 367 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19228 vs 12007 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 vs 1137.292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 vs 4.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 vs 61.701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 vs 193.595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 vs 5609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2682 | 3791 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 484 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12007 | 19228 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | 58.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 | 1235.247 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.585 | 5.195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.701 | 75.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.595 | 252.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 631 | 634 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 931 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Shared memory | 0 |