Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz
  • 652.8x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 58.971
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2070
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1514
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2070
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1514
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 February 2018
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz
Texture fill rate 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 79.859 vs 58.971
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 vs 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 vs 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 1514

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3621 vs 2687
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 354
  • Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19593 vs 12204
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 1138.276
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.134 vs 4.596
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 61.742
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 193.829
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5609
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5609
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 931 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1280 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3621 vs 2687
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 vs 354
Geekbench - OpenCL 19593 vs 12204
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.247 vs 1138.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.134 vs 4.596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.289 vs 61.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 252.311 vs 193.829
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6318 vs 5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6318 vs 5609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2687
3621
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
354
480
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12204
19593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
79.859
58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1138.276
1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.596
5.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
61.742
75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
193.829
252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5609
6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5609
6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
1514
Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
PassMark - G3D Mark 2687 3621
PassMark - G2D Mark 354 480
Geekbench - OpenCL 12204 19593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 79.859 58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1138.276 1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.596 5.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 61.742 75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 193.829 252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5609 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5609 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 1514
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2091

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.0 GCN 4.0
Code name Tiger Lake GT1 Polaris 22
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 1 February 2018
Place in performance rating 622 623
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1011 MHz
Compute units 48
Core clock speed 300 MHz 931 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 1280
Pixel fill rate 13.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 52.80 GTexel/s 80.88 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 204.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 1024 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz
Memory type HBM2
Shared memory 0