Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1011 MHz
• 652.8x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 vs 58.971
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1514
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1514

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 vs 2683
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 vs 368
• Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19228 vs 12008
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 1137.292
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 4.585
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 61.701
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 193.595
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5609
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2683 3799
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	368 483
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12008 19228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.73 58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.292 1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.585 5.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.701 75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.595 252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 1514

Compare specifications (specs)