AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs ATI FireGL V5600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and ATI FireGL V5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 12.6x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 120
- 13.5x better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3809 vs 341
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 445
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 120 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3809 vs 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 445 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V5600
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2204 vs 1514
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2204 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2204 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2204 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V5600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | ATI FireGL V5600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3809 | 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 | 445 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19300 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | 2204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | 2204 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | ATI FireGL V5600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 22 | RV630 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 634 | 631 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Transistor count | 390 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 |